On Garments and Attire
Bitches rarely need a reason to bitch. They bitch almost about everything within their "bitching" range. Having this very elaborate introduction out of the way, one can move along with whatever it is he has to say.
That satisfaction is humanly impossible to attain might be one reason why humans always strive to find ways, means to arrive at such an elusive state. And it might be a reason why they bitch, because the object of desire remains unrealized.
This, however, is not a moral monograph justifying bitching due to dissatisfaction or un-satisfaction. But one has to investigate before blogging. One has to has to "probe" as to see the other side and how it operates. Not because I am convinced by the reasoning or even think it merits attention, but for the sake of giving a tiny bit moral agency for a segment of society that is dispossessed by definition.
There are many ways in which one could approach clothing and attire. One could think of a functionalist notion of attire. That it serves a function, a particular function. One could use an aesthetic approach. That how humans dress is a way of acting out conceptions about beauty and what we perceive as aesthetically appealing.
As such, since clothing is fundamentally a human feature, its becomes widely divergent and eclectic. It can thus be only explained by references to a wide array ideas and and experiences.
Such a view, such insight can be easily disregarded, missed by bitchy, gay queens.
Who would bitch on anyone and on anything as long as they don't get legally indicted for it.
(to be continued)
That satisfaction is humanly impossible to attain might be one reason why humans always strive to find ways, means to arrive at such an elusive state. And it might be a reason why they bitch, because the object of desire remains unrealized.
This, however, is not a moral monograph justifying bitching due to dissatisfaction or un-satisfaction. But one has to investigate before blogging. One has to has to "probe" as to see the other side and how it operates. Not because I am convinced by the reasoning or even think it merits attention, but for the sake of giving a tiny bit moral agency for a segment of society that is dispossessed by definition.
There are many ways in which one could approach clothing and attire. One could think of a functionalist notion of attire. That it serves a function, a particular function. One could use an aesthetic approach. That how humans dress is a way of acting out conceptions about beauty and what we perceive as aesthetically appealing.
As such, since clothing is fundamentally a human feature, its becomes widely divergent and eclectic. It can thus be only explained by references to a wide array ideas and and experiences.
Such a view, such insight can be easily disregarded, missed by bitchy, gay queens.
Who would bitch on anyone and on anything as long as they don't get legally indicted for it.
(to be continued)
Comments